ChatGPT gave false information, here is the biggest reason not to trust artificial intelligence

by NOYB (It’s Not About You), an advocacy group in Austria OpenAIA privacy complaint filed against has sparked a new debate in the technology world. According to the complaint, OpenAI ChatGPT The artificial intelligence chatbot named gave false information about a specified person. According to a Reuters report, this may violate the European Union’s privacy rules.

ChatGPTProviding incorrect date of birth information and producing misleading information instead of answering the query “I don’t know” is a phenomenon called “hallucination”. This refers to the situation where artificial intelligence often gives misleading answers by fabricating the truth. Artificial intelligence Chatbots, like politicians, can present sometimes inaccurate information with peculiar aplomb. Aside from making things up about innocent things like recipes, producing false information about real people can have much more serious consequences.

OpenAIHe stated that he could not help deleting false information and that such a change was technically not possible. However, it offered to filter or block data on certain queries. According to the company’s privacy policy, if users notice “untrue information” produced by artificial intelligence, they can submit a “correction request”, but the company does not guarantee whether inaccuracies can be corrected in all cases.

ChatGPT gave false information, here is the biggest reason not to trust artificial intelligence

This situation is not limited to just a single complaint,
ChatGPT‘s tendency to produce untrue information may fall foul of the region’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This regulation controls how personal data is used and processed. Citizens of the European Union have rights to personal information, including the correction of inaccurate data. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in serious financial penalties, in some cases up to four percent of global annual turnover. Regulators may order changes to the way information is handled. This

NOYB data protection lawyer Maartje de Graaf said: “Currently, companies are ChatGPT “It is clear that chatbots such as these cannot be made compliant with EU law,” he said. “If a system cannot produce accurate and transparent results, it cannot be used to generate data about individuals. “Technology must comply with legal requirements, not the other way around.”

The complaint also OpenAIClaiming that ‘s lack of transparency, he states that the company does not disclose the source of the data it produces about individuals or whether this data is stored indefinitely. This is of great importance, especially when it comes to data regarding private individuals.