Evidence was deleted due to technical glitch
According to the lawsuit documents, the newspapers’ legal teams used OpenAI’s training data to identify their own news articles. More than 150 hours it worked. However, OpenAI’s accidental deletion of this data led to the loss of a potentially critical set of evidence in the case. OpenAI acknowledged the error and attempted to recover the data; However, the recovered contents were stated to be incomplete and unreliable. OpenAI’s lawyers describe the incident as a “technical glitch”, while The New York Times lawyers stated that this situation There is no evidence that it was intentional he stated.
In this lawsuit, which was initiated in December last year, The New York Times claimed that OpenAI and its partner Microsoft developed artificial intelligence tools by using millions of news articles without permission. The company argues that this has led to OpenAI becoming a content producer in direct competition with NYT. NYT, copyright infringement from OpenAI on the grounds billions of dollars in compensation demands.
NYT’s lawyers stated that the case has cost the company more than $1 million to date. This amount represents a large litigation expense that many publishers cannot afford. Meanwhile, OpenAI’s deals with major organizations like Axel Springer, Conde Nast, and The Verge’s parent company Vox Media show that many publishers are choosing to partner rather than fight.
This news our mobile application Download using
You can read it whenever you want (even offline):
Source link: https://www.donanimhaber.com/openai-bir-davada-potansiyel-kanitlari-yanlislikla-sildi–184462