OpenAI, which was sued by 3 writers named Sarah Silverman, Michael Chabon and Paul Tremblay on the grounds that its ChatGPT artificial intelligence assistant violated copyright, was acquitted in the American court. The judge declared that there was no evidence that ChatGPT committed content theft through its language algorithm.
OpenAI emerged victorious from the litigation process
The authors reacted to this decision and claimed that the activities of OpenAI violated copyrights and provided unfair profits. However, since ChatGPT does not quote the authors’ sentences directly but puts these sentences into different forms, it becomes very difficult to provide evidence of copyright irregularity. OpenAI company also used this advantage during the litigation process and took advantage of the fact that there was no data that could serve as evidence in court.
The fact that the extent of the damage that the authors claim to have suffered is not fully known makes a long-term struggle to seek justice very difficult. In addition, the fact that no one knows exactly the working principle of ChatGPT has eliminated the possibility of providing valid evidence about how such a violation of rights occurred.
OpenAI officials, who made a statement after the case was over, said that they would definitely not stop using copyrighted content, because these contents manifest themselves in every field and they had to benefit from them to train artificial intelligence models.
So what do you think about this issue? What do you think OpenAI should do? You can easily share your answers with us in the comments section below. Your opinions are valuable to us.
Source link: https://shiftdelete.net/openai-dava-sonucunda-aklandi